How Do Will and Would Describe Habits and Characteristics? (C1 Exercises)

Will, often with always or just, describes a present characteristic tendency, as in she will always leave the light on, while would describes a repeated past action, not a state, as in we would spend every summer at the farm. For past habitual states, used to must be used instead of would.

Grammar Rule

Will (often with always/just) describes a present characteristic tendency, sometimes with admiration or exasperation. Would describes a repeated past action, not a state. A key restriction: would cannot describe a past habitual state — used to must be used instead, since used to covers both actions and states while would covers only actions.

Will and Would for Habits and Characteristics: Rules and Examples

Form Use Example
Will (+always/just) present habitual/typical trait She will always leave the light on.
Would repeated past action (not state) We would spend every summer at the farm.
vs. Used to habitual past actions AND states I used to have a bicycle.

Remember: Would covers only repeated past actions, not states — use used to for past habitual states.

Practice Test

Instructions

Answer each question in the test below using will or would correctly for habits and characteristics. You will get a new random set of questions every time you retake the test, plus a downloadable results summary with your name and score at the end.

C1-33 Will and Would for Habits and Characteristics

Click «Start the test» to begin right away — no signup required. You can get a personalized certificate with your name and score at the end, if you want one.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does will describe when used for habits?

A present characteristic tendency, as in she will always leave the light on.

What does would describe when used for habits?

A repeated past action, not a state, as in we would spend every summer at the farm.

Can would describe a past habitual state?

No, used to must be used instead, as in I used to have a bicycle.

Why does used to cover more ground than would?

Because used to covers both past habitual actions and states, while would covers only actions.