How Does Which Refer to an Entire Previous Clause? (C1 Exercises)

In a non-defining relative clause, which can refer to the whole idea in the previous clause rather than a single noun, as in he arrived late, which annoyed everyone. This use always requires a comma before which and never appears in defining clauses; that cannot replace it here.

Grammar Rule

In a non-defining relative clause, which can refer to the whole idea in the previous clause (sentential/clausal reference), not just a single noun: He arrived late, which annoyed everyone. Always preceded by a comma, never used in defining clauses, and which can never be replaced by that in this function.

Non-Defining Relative Clauses with Which Referring to a Whole Clause: Rules and Examples

Use Rule Example
Which referring to whole clause comma required; which is not replaceable by that here The flight was delayed six hours, which meant we missed our connection.
Which referring to a noun ordinary non-defining clause The car, which was red, sped off.

Remember: Use a comma before which whenever it summarizes the whole previous clause rather than a single noun.

Practice Test

Instructions

Answer each question in the test below using which to refer to a whole previous clause correctly. You will get a new random set of questions every time you retake the test, plus a downloadable results summary with your name and score at the end.

C1-05 Non-Defining Relative Clauses with Which Referring to a Whole Clause

No necesitas registrarte para empezar. Al finalizar verás tu calificación de inmediato, y si quieres podrás agregar tu nombre para personalizar y descargar tu resultado.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can which refer to an entire previous clause?

Yes, as in he arrived late, which annoyed everyone.

Is a comma required before this use of which?

Yes, a comma is always required before which in this function.

Can that replace which in this structure?

No, that can never replace which when it refers to a whole previous clause.

Does this structure appear in defining relative clauses?

No, it only appears in non-defining relative clauses.